Dec 6, 2018

‘Nick’: A fuck up of epic proportions.

Christopher Spivey

I feel sure that not for the first time this post could get me into trouble with the Establishment so I hope you have my back?
You have? Good, then I shall begin.
Now, on the 3rd of December the British national press ran a story which revealed the true identity of the man previously known as only “Nick”.
Do you remember him?
“Nick was the fella whose allegations sparked the VIP sex abuse investigation into the likes of the former MP Harvey Proctor.
The following is the Chimp’s version of events:

‘Nick’ unmasked: Man whose ‘fake’ claims of VIP abuse sparked £2.5m police probe is named and pictured for the first time

• For four years, Press has been barred from disclosing real name of Carl Beech
• But identity was revealed yesterday after a judge lifted the reporting restriction
• His allegations sparked the the £2.5million Westminster VIP paedophile probe

By STEPHEN WRIGHT and GLEN KEOGH and EMINE SINMAZ FOR THE DAILY MAIL

PUBLISHED: 15:22, 3 December 2018 | UPDATED: 11:03, 4 December 2018

The man known as ‘Nick’ whose claims sparked the £2.5million Westminster VIP paedophile probe was finally unmasked yesterday.

For four years, the Press has been barred from disclosing the real name of Carl Beech, 50.

But his identity was revealed yesterday after a judge lifted the reporting restriction after Beech was accused of perverting the course of justice.

He had previously accused former Conservative prime minister Edward Heath, Tory ex-home secretary Leon Brittan and the former head of the armed forces, Field Marshal Lord Bramall, of being part of a VIP child sex ring.
He also claimed some of the men –including ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor –were involved in the murders of three boys. Since 2014 – when he first went public with his allegations of VIP child sex abuse and murder – he had only been known by the pseudonym ‘Nick’.

His real identity was revealed after he appeared in court yesterday over allegations he invented his claims of child sex abuse and serial murder. Beech, who is accused of 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud, attended a hearing at Newcastle Crown Court via videolink.

Judge Paul Sloan QC, the Recorder of Newcastle, lifted a reporting restriction which prevented media outlets from identifying the defendant.

No pleas have been entered and Beech has been listed to stand trial on May 7.

The proceedings will take place at Newcastle Crown Court and are scheduled to last between six and eight weeks.

At a hearing last month, Beech’s barrister, Raymond Tully, said: ‘We anticipate that the matter will be fully contested.’

The charges of perverting the course of justice include allegations Beech lied about witnessing three child murders and falsely claimed to have been sexually assaulted by a paedophile ring including senior ranking officers within the military, military intelligence, politicians and a TV presenter.

Prosecutors also allege he provided a penknife and two military epaulettes, falsely saying that he had retained them when he was abused as a child, and falsified an email account and provided false information purportedly sent from someone called ‘Fred’, who he had named as present when he claimed he was abused by a paedophile ring.

It is also alleged by the Crown Prosecution Service that he falsely claimed that he had suffered serious injuries as a result of having been sexually and physically abused as a child.

The fraud charge alleges that he falsely claimed £22,000 in criminal injuries compensation by saying ‘he was subjected to abuse by a paedophile ring, knowing this to be untrue and intending thereby to make a gain for himself’.

Scotland Yard’s Operation Midland inquiry into Beech’s allegations of child rape and serial murder involving an establishment child sex ring ran for 16 months and cost £2.5million. It closed without a single arrest in March 2016.

Earlier this year, the CPS said there was ‘sufficient evidence’ to bring 12 charges of perverting the course of justice and one of fraud against him.

Frank Ferguson, the CPS’s head of special crime, said in July: ‘The CPS has considered a file of evidence from Northumbria Police relating to allegations of perverting the course of justice and fraud by a 50-year-old man.

‘The police investigation provided evidence that the man had made a number of false allegations alleging multiple homicides and sexual abuse said to have been carried out in the 1970s and 1980s.

‘Following careful consideration we have concluded there is sufficient evidence to bring a number of criminal charges.’ SOURCE  

Now, you will notice that there is very little information given over about Beech. I mean, apart from his age, there is nothing about where he lives or what he does for a living. Indeed, you would be entailed to conclude that he is nothing more than a weird Geordie fantasist, jumping on the political paedo bandwagon.
But he isn’t.
You see, on the 27th November 2018 a PDF (found HERE) concerning the persecution of a whistle blower named Dr Corascendea Cathar reappeared on the interweb.
Good timing some of the more cynical of you might might rightly say since the PDF was allegedly first published in 2011. Nevertheless, it begins thus:
The following document describes how Dr Corascendea Cathar, a linguist, lost her job and became persecuted for pointing out the apparent misappropriation of a large sum of public money intended for language services to vulnerable people.
Dr Cathar alerted to the abuse of those vulnerable people by social workers assisted by members of the police and she demanded the investigation of the deaths resultant from withdrawal of essential services in the NHS to individuals registered as vitally dependent on those services by the very organisation that withdrew them in full knowledge of the consequences.
The BBC made about Dr Cathar a malicious fabrication in 2012 broadcast in January 2013, indicating her as a murderer of a person who died under chemotherapy 4 years after Dr Cathar last saw that person, in order to discredit her as a witness and to subject her to hate and possibly to violence.
The film unduly showed Dr Cathar’s home with all entrances and windows, possibly inviting an angry mob to attack her in her home and to kill her as a “murderer”.
In autumn of 2017, an individual connected to the Crown, Claudia Joseph, personal biographer to the Duchess of Cambridge, the future Queen, was renewing and disseminating the BBC lies via the Hello! magazine and in Mail Online, even though the story was in the meantime exposed as false and
the BBC protégée, Chris Geiger, was identified as an impostor cashing in on the suffering of real cancer patients.
Geiger was thrown out of all serious venues by 2015, but made it back to the BBC in 2017 as an attempted “baker”. Despite the support, the attempt has not made it beyond round 2.
Also by 2017, those responsible for the social work abuse were already investigated and the majority lost their jobs, but justice for Dr Cathar was nowhere seen and no-one prevented, or defended her against the continued malice and lies now spearheaded by an individual connected to the Crown.
The social work and police scandal was reported on in the local and national press in summer of 2017. The head of Gloucestershire County Council, Peter Bungard, was questioned and named.
It looks like Justice for what was done to Dr Cathar is left to God alone. Dr Cathar e-mail of 5th June 2014 to Laurence Robertson, MP:
“I have turned to you for help (30th May 2014) and you betrayed me in a way that I consider to be most abominable. You produced a long list of lies and distortions about me the full contents of which I was unable to as much as read, while abusing information I provided about my case and you made sure that I did not get compensation from the Health Ombudsman that may, otherwise, have been under consideration.
I believe your relevant actions should be exposed and you, and possible other MPs like you, should be sacked by the people.”
The PDF then goes on to give links proving that the MP Laurence Robertson is a wrong-un… No surprise there then.
But here is the thing. The person who suspended Dr Cathar was old “Nick”.

So, “Nick” conspired against a whistle blower then decided to become one himself. Yet I find it very hard to believe that someone who grew up in care and who claims to have been sexually abused as well as witness children being murdered by top MP’s could hold such an impeccable CV… Such high achievers are simply not products of our care system – especially those who were abhorrently sexually abused.
The PDF then goes on to make more allegations about “Nick” being complicit in the silencing of Dr Cathar and as such – knowing what the Establishment is capable of – it is strange that he became a whistle-blower himself, don’t cha think?
Indeed, it would appear that “Nick” was rewarded for his part in discrediting Dr Cathar… That is most certainly the insinuation in the PDF anyway:

Therefore you have to question what Nick hoped to gain by becoming a whistle blower himself? After all, he can’t have been short of a few bob and he certainly had a high social standing, which has now all been thrown away for nothing… Unless of course, our “Nick” agreed to take the fall in order for the Establishment to discredit the real victims of these elite paedophile rings and clear those prominent members who were already under the public spotlight for noncing… Proctor, Brittan, Heath etc, etc.
Indeed, that would make sense and in doing so suggest that Proctor and Co are in reality guilty as charged… Which I think that we all know to be true. In fact I suggest that you all read my long article; Predators.
Moreover, it is mighty strange that having now revealed “Nick’s” real identity, the press have been less than forthcoming about his lofty position in life… I mean, if I know about his rising star within the NHS, then you can bet your bottom dollar that the hacks in the national press do too.
Course, by the same token it is also strange that the author of the PDF has not updated it further now that Beech has been publicly named… After all, the PDF was updated just 8 days after “Nick” was splashed all over the headlines again:

Man known as ‘Nick’, 50, whose allegations of abuse by ‘Westminster paedophile ring’ led to huge police investigation will stand trial next year for ‘£22,000 compensation fraud’

• The man who can only be identified as ‘Nick’ will stand trial in Newcastle in 2019 
• Nick, 50, sparked a huge police inquiry into alleged Westminster paedophile ring
• He claimed he had been raped and abused for nine years by VIPs in the 1970s
• He is charged with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one of fraud

By HENRY MARTIN FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 18:26, 19 November 2018 | UPDATED: 18:26, 19 November 2018

The man whose accusations sparked a massive police inquiry into an alleged paedophile ring in Westminster will go to trial next year.

The 50-year-old, who can be identified only as ‘Nick’, is accused of lying to police and fraudulently receiving £22,000 in compensation.

Nick, whose identity cannot be reported for legal reasons, claimed in 2014 that he had been raped and abused for nine years by a VIP gang during the 1970s.

He appeared at Newcastle Crown Court accused of 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud. Source

And of course just 6 days after the PDF was updated, Beech was publicly named in the press… Yet the author  never thought to update the PDF further given the huge role that Beech played in discrediting Dr Cathar! It doesn’t make sense does it.
In fact you could say that the whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Oh, and one more thing. I am still nearly £40 short of the £266 monthly site fees which are due in a couple of days time. Worse still, I am still suffering from Chronic Fatigue, feeling very sorry for myself and very, very short of cash so a little Christmas cheer would not go amiss… Just sayin’.

Related

By Needlz • Written by me • 19

Waterboarded My Arse

DID THE QUEEN ORDER THE ASSASSINATION OF PRINCESS DIANA?

Matt Taylor - 20th February 2014

Below is the latest offering from my friend Matt Taylor, who asks the question: Did Sweaty Betty have Diana: Princess of Wales bumped orf?

Now, as some of you know, I have done extensive research into Diana’s death, going as far as reading the mind numbingly boring and overly repetitive Paget Report more than once.

I have even written over 50,000 words so far in an unfinished expose of Diana’s death and reading articles like Matt’s compels me to resume writing it… Which I fully intend to do sometime this year.

It is however, without a doubt that Diana was murdered in a ritual sacrifice and likewise the order to terminate Diana’s life came from the very, very top.

Whether Sweaty Betty conveyed that order or her husband the Duck did will probably never be known.

Indeed, the order may have come from neither as it is quite possible that Prince Bugger Lugs may have dished it out.

Never the less, there can be no doubt that all three of the Nonce Ponce Parasites were all in agreement that Diana had to go.

Moreover and quite tragic; I don’t doubt that Little Willie and Harry H Hewitt now know the truth.

They are after all, fully paid up members of Monsters Inc… Just sayin’.

DID THE QUEEN ORDER THE ASSASSINATION OF PRINCESS DIANA?

Be it paedophilia, lost kids, or Princess Diana’s assassination, it always comes back to the Queen. 

As a Royal Military Policeman in 1996, I stood in front of the Queen’s picture and pledged the words, “I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will, as in duty bound, honestly and faithfully defend Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, in Person, Crown and Dignity against all enemies, and will observe and obey all orders of Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors, and of the generals and officers set over me.”

I left the army in 2001 after twitching my allegiance from the Queen to my mother and in the process broke a number of rules set out in the Army Act 1955.

Since leaving a career as a MP (Military Policeman), I’m now working towards earning another career as a MP (Member of Parliament.)

Since 1997, my political ambitions have been to eliminate war, poverty and child-abuse.

• I’d eliminate war with the SOS War Plan. (this link opens a youtube video)
• I’d eliminate poverty with the Bradbury Pound.
• I’d eliminate child-abuse by putting Bill Maloney in charge.

With an interest in child-abuse it was only natural that I would follow the issue as a matter of duty.

When Jimmy Saville died I was genuinely sad at the man’s passing. Jimmy fixed it for everyone, whilst I grew up and I came to love and respect the man as an outstanding member of society.

So you can imagine my shock and horror that even a hero whom I believed in, turned out to be an evil murdering demon from the darkest reaches of Hell. I was furious, and I’ve been furious ever since.

A good policeman should always investigate the facts without judgement of where it takes them.

It always comes back to the Queen. Take for example the assassination of Prince Diana.

Since my order for the arrest of the Queen and David Cameron went viral across the world a few weeks ago, I’ve been keeping an keen eye on the comings and goings of the Royal family.

Never one to disappoint.

I’ve been getting my updates on Royal news from the News Now website and since reading Chris Spivey’s article, Monsters Inc, (which you if you haven’t done so already, you really must read,) my view of the Queen has been changed forever.

Read more: The Taylor Royal Family or the Rothschild Royal Family, you decide?

Two books have found themselves into my hands, Elizabeth & Philip: The Untold Story by Charles Higham and Roy Moseley and Diana: Death of a Goddess by David Cohen.

My oath to the Queen is null and void.

Of-course having read Chris Spivey’s Monsters Inc article and the work of Kevin Annett, I realised straight away that the above oath is immediately annulled because the Crown on which I pledged allegiance, is a foreign criminal Nazi organisation, hence making the oath null and void.

Now here is something I found interesting while reading the Last rites and Freudian slips chapter of David Cohen’s book.

Remember the coldness of the Queen towards Diana’s death?

What most commentators found shocking was that Prince William and Prince Harry had to go to church on the same day and act as normal, as if they were in control of their feelings when their mother had just died.

Though in defence, Lady Angela, a loyal servant of the Queen Mother said, “They wanted to go to church. If you are a Christian and your mother has been killed, it is a comfort going to church.”

Never cry in public.

Then just as on his wedding day, Prince Charles said something bizarre under stress. Charles looked at french doctors who tried to save Diana’s life, Riou and Pavie and said “Felicitations!”

Continue Reading

PR stunt exposes a PCC Cu… “Errr… What rhymes with ‘Stunt”?

Chris Spivey - 31st January 2013

On the 25th of January 2013 between the hours of 12 Noon and 1.30 PM, the newly elected Police and Crime Commissioner for Sussex, Katy Bourne took part in what she thought would be a good PR stunt.

In her (very limited) wisdom she had decided to host a live question and answer session on Facebook.

What a fucking mistake for the totally out of touch knobhead to make.

Expecting – somewhat naively – to be in for a pleasant time, you can almost feel the rising panic she must have felt, as you scroll down the FB page and see the sheer number of embarrassingly awkward questions that came flooding in. 

Despite living in Essex I was made aware of this event – albeit after it had finished – by a friend. After taking a gander, I intended to write a quick report about this PR disaster for inclusion on this site the very same day – unfortunately time didn’t allow me too in the end.

However, after receiving a message yesterday, 30/1/13 from a Mr Matt Taylor (see article below), I felt compelled to publish his  report along with some print screen photos of the PR disaster that I had taken on the 25th.

I am sure many of you already know my view on the Police. However, I should point out that there are still some good, honest Policemen amongst the thick thugs – albeit they are mainly older and rapidly shrinking in numbers. This minority are horrified, dismayed and even embarrassed  at what their profession has become.

I am sure ‘Clueless Katy’  would be equally horrified to learn that I have a number of Policemen who regularly read this site, one of whom actually donates. Hardly surprising when you know about the corruption that takes place within the forces. Corruption that I’m sorry to say, starts  from the top down.  

Clueless Kate! You are my Mug of the Day.

 http://fightersagainstcorruption.20m.com/katy_bourne_exposed.html

KATY BOURNE EXPOSED

Katy Bourne, the first Police and Crime Commissioner for Sussex took part in a live Facebook chat which many people have called a ‘Farce’.

Advertised as a chance to chat directly with Katy, many people were left disappointed and frustrated, with many of their questions going unanswered.

The live Facebook chat took place on Friday 25 January from 12 noon to 1.30 pm.

Posting under the name ‘Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner’, Katy Bourne promised that questions could be either sent ahead of time or posted live during the chat.

The first sets of questions were sent in by Quentin Houldey who brought up the subject of Special Constables. A subject which has caused Katy Bourne problems since she pledged to put a Special Constable in every village.

1. What exactly would you expect specials constables to achieve?
2. Would they be expected to record local crime and deal with small time issues that would then free up regular officers?
3. Would they be completing the Quality Focused Investigation (QFI) for these crimes that regular officers are expected to complete?

No answers to these initial questions were forth-coming, either during the hour and a half chat, or anytime afterwards.

The next question brought up the worrying development in Worthing of gang members from London, infiltrating the seaside town, which is seen as virgin territory for London based criminal gangs.

Quote “What are the Police going to do about the alarming number of London black boys descending on Worthing and selling drugs with a blatancy which suggests they can’t believe their luck at finding a town where they can act with impunity?”

Again no answer….

The subject quickly moved onto Police brutality and corruption. John Flynn joined in the conversation by telling us about being mace sprayed and half kicked to death in a cell. The CCTV footage which was requested, was ‘lost’ in downloading! ‘Curiously’ he said, ‘there were only two people allowed or capable of downloading footage, one of who just happened to be the custody Sergeant responsible for my care that night.’

Some contributors even started to complain that their questions were being taken down.

This prompted ‘Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner’ to defend herself with ‘Chris we haven’t deleted any questions – and won’t unless they are offensive!’

Soft questions were asked such as ‘What the hardest part of her job was?’ and more in-depth such as ‘Do you welcome the extra public scrutiny of the Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioners?’

The only response was ‘Lots of questions coming in. I’m answering these as fast as I can, working my way up from the bottom of the page. Thanks for your patience, I will get to you. Katy.’

Keeping to her word, Katy Bourne did eventually answer a question.

The question posed by 
Fabrice Bardsley read, ‘Transparency of Police Officers – re: Freemasonic membership. In light of links to child abuse, child abuse investigations and institutional abuse investigations that have not been successful, open and transparent in the public’s eyes. Where serious accusations of freemasonic influence have been made, will the PCC make the protection of the young and vulnerable her priorities, by making it policy that all police employees make a declaration of Masonic membership? So that there is no question of impropriety as there is today. Thus demonstrating the police is working for the people of Sussex, not vested interests of the polices own.’

To which her reply was ‘Hi Fabrice Bardsley thanks for joining the chat today. The public rightly expects the highest standards of behaviour by Sussex Police officers and staff, and all allegations of misconduct are taken incredibly seriously. The national HMIC Integrity Report recently highlighted that forces have different processes for defining and investigating corruption. While their inspection found no specific issues of concern in how Sussex Police deals with these issues, we are working to ensure we meet all their national recommendations to create a more consistent approach. Thanks, Katy.’

Let’s take a moment to look at her answer.

To state that all allegations of misconduct (or even common allegations of crimes for that matter) are taken ‘incredibly seriously’ either deems Katy Bourne a lair or incredibly ignorant off Sussex Police’s record over the last few decades.

As reported by the many local and national newspapers over the last few weeks, a number of victims of child-abuse approached Sussex Police to report crimes committed by the infamous TV personality, Jimmy Saville. On all occasions, Sussex Police encouraged the victims to drop their allegations due to the nature of the offence and probability of a failed prosecution.

As the Deputy Chief Constable said ‘We also recognise that we could have done better and are committed to honest reflection and learning lessons for the future.’

‘Could have done better,’ is the understatement of the century.

This, compounded with her decision to extend Sussex Chief Constable Martin Richard’s contract for a year, (after his misconduct charge), does nothing to give anything Katy Bourne says any credibility.

She states with conviction ‘Protecting the young and vulnerable is one of the highest priorities for any police force and Sussex Police is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of all children. Thanks for your communications today, but I really do have to go now. Katy.’

Chas Alexander asks, ‘How can this be? When a complaint was made against Arun District Council in 2002 that a paedophile ring was operating within the council offices, the complaint had been interfered with by the Chief Constable who appears to be friends with the ex-Chief Executive of the Council.’

‘Interfered with’ as in 2008 when child-abuse victims approached Sussex Police about Jimmy Saville, but were turned away with a smile and a pat on their bottoms for their troubles.

How can Katy Bourne say “Protecting the young and vulnerable is one of the highest priorities for any police force and Sussex Police is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of all children,” when evidence suggests a paedophile ring running inside a local authority, has never been fully investigated.

As Chas Alexander asks in his ‘REMOVE SUSSEX CHIEF CONSTABLE’ petition on the 38 Degrees website, ‘How many children have continued to be abused in Littlehampton/Bognor Regis in the last 10 years since the complaint was originally made?’ Sussex Police need to answer the allegation that they have deliberately refused to investigate friends who work for Arun District Council and they need to be held to account as does the Chief Constable.’

Throughout the Facebook farce it became evident that all Katy Bourne cared about was whether Andy Murray was beating Roger Federer at tennis,

“Yes, who’s winning?” she typed
“Go Murray.”

But still the questions poured in and not enough answers spilled out.

The subject of police corruption and the paedophile/Masonic connection crept up again and again.

Her favourite response seemed to be ‘Thanks for your comments. Perhaps you could email me with some more details and I will look into this: spcc@sussex-pcc.gov.uk. Thanks, Katy.’

Though even she had to eventually confront the subject, ‘Hi Helen Ansell and Fabrice Bardsley. Police officers are required to declare on appointment and throughout their career any affiliation to Masonic lodges. Thanks, Katy.’

Fabrice Bardsley, ‘Really? A public declaration? Where can the public obtain these records, Katy?’

Helen Ansell, ‘I take it this declaration is public record? How can we access it?’

To which she replied, ‘The declaration is to the employer and is not for public record.’

Fabrice Bardsley ‘….err Katy, Thanks for the reply, now for the 3rd time can you please answer my question? – Will you make protection of young and vulnerable people your priority by making it policy to require Sussex Police officers to declare (publicly) if they are a member of a Masonic lodge, Yes or No? – I’m very glad you think corruption and misconduct are under control… I’m asking if you are going to take the simple step I mentioned above to restore public confidence… and if not why? – How can a declaration to Sussex Police help the public with accountability and transparency?’

Yep, you guessed it, no answer…

She couldn’t get away from the Facebook Live Chat Farce quick enough, “Only 15 minutes left and then I have to rush to my next appointment. I’m still answering your questions and any that I haven’t responded to before 1.30pm I will get back to as soon as I can. Thanks, Katy
”

But she has never got back to any of the questions.

Are we being fair on Katy Bourne?

It’s true that dozens of questions were thrown at her and true that only a few answers were thrown back.

Whose idea was it to do live Facebook chat? They must have known it would attract a big following. According to the Facebook event page 196 people were invited, 56 confirmed and 4 said maybe. Shouldn’t a different approach have been made?

Is it fair to say that Katy Bourne is covering up a Sussex Paedophile ring? Is it fair to say Katy Bourne is covering a Masonic Paedophile ring?

We’ll leave the last word with Katy, “Hi everyone thanks so much for taking part but I have to dash now. Apologies if I didn’t get to your question – I will respond. In the meantime, stay safe. Let’s do this again soon.”

As her slogan says, ‘Ensuring we are all safer in Sussex.’ Shouldn’t it rather say ‘Ensuring Masonic Paedophiles are all safer in Sussex?’

Sign the 38 Degree Petition to the REMOVE SUSSEX CHIEF CONSTABLE

Related

I'm Confused about Madeline!February 7, 2013In "World News"

Dum as fuck. Fat as fuck.June 28, 2013In "Politicians"

Its a stunt claims the cunt.April 4, 2013In "Health"

By Needlz • The Police •

More Paedo-filesThe land of make believe